Home
Aug. 23rd, 2005 @ 02:32 pm classic matusow
The new issue of cardplayer has an interview with mike matusow. Apparently it's not online yet but it's a highly entertaining read. Those of you who aren't personally acquainted with mike may not know that it's easy to dislike mike when you first meet him (trust me, I sure did) but almost impossible to dislike him after you've known him for a while. He's quite a character. So I'm mostly laughing with mike on this one and only a little bit at him.

MK: Still, a million dollars is a pretty good score.
MM: I needed to make one of the top three places. Number nine doesn't mean anything to me. It just enables me to pay off a few markers.


Ouch, is he saying he's millions in debt? That's unfortunate. It's interesting to me that people often believe they can gamble their way out of debt that deep when gambling is what buried them in the first place.

MK: Does the notion of going broke bother you?
MM: I have people I can borrow money from. I don't worry about money. When things get bad, my mom asks how I will pay bills. I say, "Ma, shut up. Have I ever worried about money?" I don't worry about money. Somebody will always loan me money.


Then a bit later:

MM: [...] Right now there is probably not a human being in the world with less regard for money than me. I make bets for thousands of dollars that I know I can't win. I was at the poker table once and made a $5,000 bet with Howard Lederer that Shawshank Redemption won best picture. Doyle Brunson told me not to make that bet because he made it once and lost. Of course, I didn't listen, and had to give Howard $5,000.

It's funny to imagine people lining up to loan him money when he talks like that. "You may as well just be lighting this on fire, but don't worry, I'll pay you back."

MK: [...] your last hand against him [Raymer] was pretty much a coin flip, with your pair of nines against his two overcards and four to a flush. That was when he outdrew you.
MM: So, if it's fifty-fifty, would you want to go in holding a made hand or needing to make a hand?
MK: [STUNNED SILENCE]


I made up the stunned silence part. He doesn't even comment on that answer. GREAT MOMENTS IN MATHEMATICS!
About this Entry
From:[info]oscarmc
Date: August 23rd, 2005 10:10 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
When things get bad, my mom asks how I will pay bills. I say, "Ma, shut up. Have I ever worried about money?"

Ahh..bless his heart. You can't help but like him.
From:[info]scott_matusow
Date: September 22nd, 2005 08:13 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Mike has never told MY MOTHER (im his brother) to shut up, thats just the way he talks in interviews. Mike suffers from a slight social retardation at times which causes him to make some stupid comments at times.
From:[info]throwawayacct
Date: August 23rd, 2005 10:39 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
I can't win. I was at the poker table once and made a $5,000 bet with Howard Lederer that Shawshank Redemption won best picture. Doyle Brunson told me not to make that bet because he made it once and lost.

How can you consider yourself even remotely knowledgeable enough to take that bet, yet not know that it didn't win? 1994 was one of the classic donk years for Best Picture - Shawshank Redemption and Pulp Fiction losing out to Forrest fucking Gump, for chrissakes. Not to mention the warning he got from Doyle; I guess MM thought that Doyle was playing some kind of angle. Maybe he bet someone else that Matusow wouldn't take the bet with Lederer?


MM: So, if it's fifty-fifty, would you want to go in holding a made hand or needing to make a hand?

That's easy - I'd want the drawing hand. With a drawing hand you get the added advantage that your range of outcomes goes from neutral (you were "behind" to begin with) to pleasantly surprised. The made hand is just the opposite. Not to mention the fact that as long as you're not an obviously prohibitive favorite with your drawing hand, it can help get you more action later on, even if the drawing hand was a favorite in the first place.

From:[info]scott_matusow
Date: September 22nd, 2005 08:12 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Absurd, you want the made hand in poker, which puts you as a slight 52 percent favorite. When you make 20 cashes and 2 wsop rings, then you can spout off here. No top player would agree with you and I know many of them.
From:[info]o8poker
Date: August 23rd, 2005 11:31 pm (UTC)

Matusow

(Permanent Link)
Matusow doesn’t seem to really understand get the whole idea of EV. Yet he has good finishes in tourneys and whatnot – he has to be at least a good to very good player. So Paul, is he dumb as a box of hammers or some gifted idiot savant or what?
[User Picture Icon]
From:[info]extempore
Date: August 23rd, 2005 11:46 pm (UTC)

Re: Matusow

(Permanent Link)
Let's just say he's an enigma.
From:[info]scott_matusow
Date: September 22nd, 2005 08:47 am (UTC)

Re: Matusow

(Permanent Link)
"Matusow doesn’t seem to really understand get the whole idea of EV. Yet he has good finishes in tourneys and whatnot – he has to be at least a good to very good player. So Paul, is he dumb as a box of hammers or some gifted idiot savant or what?"

Yes he understands very much. I comment on another post about this.

Peace
[User Picture Icon]
From:[info]hgfalling
Date: August 23rd, 2005 11:36 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Maybe i can put this as a chapter quote in our book.
From:[info]zachjake
Date: August 24th, 2005 12:42 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
He got screwed. Shawshank Redemption should have won the best picture of the century
From:[info]throwawayacct
Date: August 24th, 2005 12:59 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
"...Citizen who?"
[User Picture Icon]
From:[info]joepro
Date: August 24th, 2005 02:55 am (UTC)

I want to party with that guy!

(Permanent Link)
Mike was chatting on fulltilt one night, he said he bought a new mercedes and crashed it on the first night. Somehow, I believe him.
From:[info]scott_matusow
Date: September 22nd, 2005 08:16 am (UTC)

Re: I want to party with that guy!

(Permanent Link)
actaully was a new beamer(covertible top of the line) and it was on the 3rd day he did in fact crash it, trying to show off how well the car cornered, into a curb causing 5k in damage.

thats actually true, wrong make of car though :)
[User Picture Icon]
From:[info]nextlevelacq
Date: August 24th, 2005 04:49 am (UTC)

Gambling Problems?

(Permanent Link)
Mike, obviously has a gambling problem. I can't blame him. I lost $8,000 while watching the movie Alien vs. Predator.
[User Picture Icon]
From:[info]extempore
Date: August 24th, 2005 06:41 pm (UTC)

Re: Gambling Problems?

(Permanent Link)
Let me guess: you lost it betting someone else that it was directed by Martin Scorsese and that it won the oscar for best original screenplay?
[User Picture Icon]
From:[info]shaniac
Date: August 24th, 2005 06:38 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
It's interesting to me that people often believe they can gamble their way out of debt that deep when gambling is what buried them in the first place.

Got to do the cocaine, to do the work, to make the money, to buy the cocaine, to do the work, to make the money....

Seriously though--how ELSE is a gambler supposed to get out of debt? If I read Matusow's character-type correctly, I'm sure gambling is all he knows (a better route than selling dope in any case, and I say that having done both). It's probably just a reflection of my familiarity with addictive behavior, but I can relate to the general level of madness that seems to reside in Matusow.
From:[info]easy_ee
Date: August 24th, 2005 04:03 pm (UTC)

Gambler's ruin

(Permanent Link)
I believe PP's point is, if you're that deeply in debt DUE to gambling, you aren't going to be good enough to get OUT of debt and STAY there.

Degenerate gambling is degenerate gambling, no matter if you are currently "ahead"
From:[info]scott_matusow
Date: September 22nd, 2005 08:19 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
That's absolutely right on the money bro and Im trying to get Mike to see the light and he has been TRYING lately to make a change.
I am tring very hard, I love my brother and dont want to see him destroy himself.

Mike rarely ever did Coke, he was into "X" or aka "E". Mike has been clean for over 2 years now.

Trust me, me and my family get rather aggravated at him for this behavior.

Peace
From:[info]naturalborn
Date: August 24th, 2005 09:10 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Hey, it worked for Stu Ungar. Sort of.
[User Picture Icon]
From:[info]es0terix
Date: August 24th, 2005 11:50 am (UTC)

Call Bravo

(Permanent Link)
If Mike is really that far in debt he really does need to reconsider a career choice. Here's my idea - how great would he be on a reality show! Poker players would LOVE it because you would no doubt be seeing other top pros all the time on the show, and Bravo has shown a history of wanting to make shows about totally dysfunctional people (Show Whatever Moms and Fucks, Bobby Brown, etc.)
From:[info]krizazy
Date: August 24th, 2005 09:52 pm (UTC)

Re: Call Bravo

(Permanent Link)
If Mike is really that far in debt he really does need to reconsider a career choice

Aside from this reality show you're pitching, there really isn't a job I can think of that Mike can do that'll make him as much as poker might.

Even if I were an "investor" in him, I'd prefer the non-zero chance of getting paid back that poker provides to the zero chance that him getting a normal job would.

~Duke
From:[info]scott_matusow
Date: September 22nd, 2005 08:20 am (UTC)

Re: Call Bravo

(Permanent Link)
Mike is only slighty in debt and thats about to change very soon, all i can say.

thanks for the reality tc advice, ill run that by his primary agent :)
[User Picture Icon]
From:[info]armyeye
Date: August 25th, 2005 07:47 pm (UTC)

Matusow debt

(Permanent Link)
I don't think Mike owned very much of himself in the main event.. so, I don't think his statement necessarily means he is millions in debt. Let's hope!
From:[info]scott_matusow
Date: September 22nd, 2005 08:22 am (UTC)

Re: Matusow debt

(Permanent Link)
Lets hope what, that he is debt? only very slightly, he had 50 percent of himself in the wsop main event.

2 very well known pros which i wont name backed him.

Mike is very slightly in debt, he was well into the black until he decided to piss away a nice wad playing online poker which we have talked him out of playing that much anymore.
From:[info]buhke
Date: August 27th, 2005 04:29 am (UTC)

Classic Matusow

(Permanent Link)
"I believe PP's point is, if you're that deeply in debt DUE to gambling, you aren't going to be good enough to get OUT of debt and STAY there."

I don't agree with this at all. I have a good friend that gambles on horses. He kept meticulous records and his ROI for every $2 bet was $2.02. He was betting about 5 million dollars a year with the turnover and he would go broke quite often. There was always people standing in line to loan him money, including myself, and he always won it back. He then moved to Veags, moved his wagering to offshore sites, they offered him, being a big bettor, a 10 percent rebate on all wagers. He now bets over 40 million a year and is never broke, though he lost 600k on football games last year.
[User Picture Icon]
From:[info]extempore
Date: August 27th, 2005 04:59 am (UTC)

Re: Classic Matusow

(Permanent Link)
You sidestep the point:

his ROI for every $2 bet was $2.02.

If someone is buried in debt it is far more likely their ROI per $2 bet is something less than $2.
From:[info]mfm00
Date: September 4th, 2005 08:51 am (UTC)

50-50

(Permanent Link)
Asisde from the degenerate cases of "same" hands which split pots, how many hands are there where N is the number of players and (1/N)+ epsilon (where epsilon is a "small" number) is the probability of winning when played through the river from preflop, flop or turn? N=2,3,... That is, for N=2 what hands played heads up are really very,very close to 50/50?

The odd math question after after reflecting that hand pairings often described as "coin flips" or 50/50 really aren't and the made hand is sometimes a slight, but distinct, favorite, e.g. pair v. overcards.

From:[info]samholden
Date: September 8th, 2005 03:15 pm (UTC)

Re: 50-50

(Permanent Link)
And other times the made hand is a slight underdog.

A pair of deuces versus overcard suited connectors, other than 3-4, and "unsuited connectors" (then they need to be over 6), for example.